Bilgates Vs Laden

I demonstrate 30-10-07’s News on Enadu. I am giving, as it is translation for your ready reference.

LADEN ‘GREAT INTELECTUAL’
_________________________________________

43rd place in 100.
He and Bilgates equal.
58th place to an India.
More people in America & Briton
Daily Telegraph declared through survey.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

London: Osama Bin Laden. This name is familiar to all. We watch him as hard-core terrorist who made America to shrivel. But Daily Telegraph Journal of Briton is able to watch a ‘Great Intellectual’ in him. Neither like this nor like that. It had allotted 43rd place among Top 100 live intellectuals in the world. The same place of 43rd rank was allotted to BilGates of Micro soft.

Daily Telegraph survey had declared that the most of Top 100 live intellectuals are in America and Briton. As per the details of Survey: - 43 members of intellectuals are in America and 24 in Briton. As per average, in Briton, one intellectual for each 25 lacks of people where as in America one intellectual for each 6 lacks of people. If we consider according to averages, Briton is in Top position. For this survey, people were taken in to consideration who shown very talent in the fields of science and Technology, Business and Arts. Six experts lead this survey. They formulated this list by considering five topics are by discussing with 4 thousands British people through E-Mail.
The following are the details of survey………….. [The synopsis of list is in print]

Now let us discuss!

How the survey calculated the intellectuality of people and what are their parameters we don’t know. But how BilGates can be equal to Osama Bin Laden? Mr. BilGates is doing business. At the same time he changed the human life through his Microsoft. He provided employmentation to un countable people. He facilitated crores of people. He is a man of constructive mind. Mr. Osama Bin Laden is doing terrorism. At the same time he filled the human life with terror and impeacefulness. He is a man of destructive mind. No religion will tell to flow blood of floor. No God will tell to kill people, whatever his name Allah, Rama, Buddha or Yawe or Jesus. God is love, God is faith and God is truth. How a destructive mind can be equal to constructive mind? How the construction of a great architectural building is equal to destruction of it? How drawing a beautiful painting is equal to spoil it? To draw a beautiful paint, it takes long time. And high talent, concentration and man power is required. To spoil it, it takes seconds and no talent and concentration and man power required. If anybody argue that planning and manpower was used in destroy, we can give reply to them as follows. If such qualities were used in destruction, then such qualities should not be treated as qualities, rather than they can be treat as something psychological disorder, selfishness, business, or spying taken the veil of religion.

And more over how six experts headed team can decide intellectuality’s by interviewing 4000 people whereas 600+cores of people are there in the world? How the Daily Telegraph can send indications into public to consider some people are great and so and so ranked? If we question them; then they may show some rules and regulations as special conditions or limitations of their survey.

I am not asking the legality of survey of Media. I am asking about the ethical responsibility of Media? By creating such attitudes in public, can’t people think that which manner we become famous doesn’t matter, becoming fame in important. Which manner we become rich doesn’t matter, becoming rich is important. That’s enough to ruin the humanity.

Here Enadu the Telugu Daily Newspaper printed this, as it was the survey of Daily Telegraph of Briton. May be that Daily Telegraph will print another type of survey as it was done by Enadu or some ‘X’ paper of some ‘x’ country.

This strategy resembles ‘You scratch, my back and I scratch your back’

One more factorial example, I want to explain to you. Here in our South India, in this decade itself, a notorious smuggler of Sandal wood Mr. Veerappan got shot died. This example related to him. Here the forests are not as thick as Veerappan could escape. But miraculary Veerappan could escape. Might be it was his capacity. No police could reach him. But a Media man Nakkiran Gopalan could interview him whenever he desired. If the address or where about of such inhuman smuggler was known to Media man, is it not his responsibility to inform to police and co-operate to eliminate such evils from society? To save country and to save peacefulness of public life is not responsibility of Media?

The Response of Mrs. Sonia Gandhi in this case

DATE OF COMPLAINT / REQUISATION: 27-04-2006

Addressed To Whom: Mrs. Sonia Gandhi Chair person, U.P.A. Govt.

In Person / By Post: By post in May 2006.

Contents In Complaint / Requisition: Reg. coups and spying activities of Ramoji Rao, My complaint to P.M. of India, Mr. P.V. Narasimha Rao and Ramoji Rao’s harassment.

Response: Mr. Digvijaya Singh wrote me a letter dt. 20-04-2007 as he received my complaint from Smt. Sonia Gandhi to look into the matter. I received it on 04-05-2007.

Further Happenings: On 06-06-2006, on the opening day of my School, the D.E.O. published a notice in Enadu as 290 schools of unrecognized by A.P.Govt. are not eligible to run School, to do so attract legal action including my school at Sri Sailam. But in this year beginning, no such warnings, because l left from the school field.

Ref. No. And Enclosures: Ref. No. - 04.

***********************************

DATE OF COMPLAINT / REQUISATION: 05-09-2006.

Addressed To Whom: Smt. Sonia Gandhi

By Post / In Person: By post receipt No. EE687448096IN dt. 07-09-2006.

Contents In Complaint / Requisition: Reg. continuous harassment on us by Mr. Ramoji Rao.

Response: No response.

Further Happenings: Harassment took nasty tongue level on us.

Ref. No. And Enclosures: Ref. No. - 06

**********************************

DATE OF COMPLAINT / REQUISATION: 08-04-2007.

Addressed To Whom: To Dr. Man Mohan Singh, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, and Sri A.P.J. Abdul Kalam.

By Post / In Person: By post.

Contents In Complaint / Requisition: Complaint against Mr. Ramoji Rao about his organized harassment on us with documentary and circumstantial proofs of his motive of harassment.

Response: Hon’ble President of India sent me a letter stated that he forwarded my complaint to State Govt. of A.P.

Further Happenings: The harassment was speeded up.

Ref. No. And Enclosures: Ref. No. - 12.

*********************************

DATE OF COMPLAINT / REQUISATION: 13-04-2007.

Addressed To Whom: To Dr. Man Mohan Singh, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, and Dr. A.P.J.Abdul Kalam.

By Post / In Person: By post [same copy to all]

Contents In Complaint / Requisition: Reg. the above harassment and redtapistic administration.

Response: Smt. Sonia Gandhi forwarded it to Mr. Digvijaya Singh, General Secretary, AICC & he wrote me a letter dt. 20-04-2007.

Further Happenings: With the help of my student’s parents, I could prevent the above-mentioned notice into implement and gained time up to 08-05-2007 to conduct final exams to my students.

Ref. No. And Enclosures: Ref. No. - 14.

**********************************

DATE OF COMPLAINT / REQUISATION: 10-05-2007.

Addressed To Whom: To Dr. Man Mohan Singh, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, Mr. Digvijaya Singh, Justice Subhashan Reddy -- Human Rights, Hyd., Chief Justice, Hyderabad.

By Post / In Person: By speed post, ANL Couriers.

Contents In Complaint / Requisition: Regarding the further harassment.

Response: No response.

Further Happenings: We approached New Delhi on 17-05-2007, we met Mr. Digvijaya Singh in his office, AICC, and he responded positively, given recommendation letter to C.M. of A.P.

Ref. No. And Enclosures: Ref. No. - 19.

*********************************

DATE OF COMPLAINT / REQUISATION: 17-05-2007.

Addressed To Whom: To C.M. of A.P.

By Post / In Person: In person at A.P. Bhawan, New Delhi.

Contents In Complaint / Requisition: Request to give allotment of accommodation at Sri Sailam and to protect us from Ramoji Rao’s harassment.

Response: Responded positively and taken my requisition with my friend’s address at Guntur, A.P. by saying that he would provide accommodation immediately before taking action in the matter of Ramoji Rao’s case.

Further Happenings: Till date, I did not receive any communication in spite of reminding requests to him.

Ref. No. And Enclosures: Ref. No. - 20.

**********************************

DATE OF COMPLAINT / REQUISATION: 02-06-2007.

Addressed To Whom: To P.M. of India, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, President of India, Mr. Digvijaya Singh.

By Post / In Person: By post.

Contents In Complaint / Requisition: Reminder request to provide accommodation allotment at Sri Sailam.

Response: No response except Hon’ble President of India. He forwarded it to Home Affairs and advised me to get in touch with them directly on 12-06-2007.

Further Happenings: I lost time and academic year, and ultimately I lost once again accommodation and occupation. This is repeated experience in my life.

Ref. No. And Enclosures: Ref. No. - 22.

***********************************

DATE OF COMPLAINT / REQUISATION: 09-06-2007.

Addressed To Whom: To P.M. of India, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, President of India, Mr. Digvijaya Singh.

By Post / In Person: By post.

Contents In Complaint / Requisition: Reminder request to protect us from the harassment.

Response: No response.

Further Happenings: Again, I’m in such a situation to restart the life.

Ref. No. And Enclosures: Ref. No. - 24.

***********************************

The Episode of YS Raja Sekhara Reddy

I decided to bring my complaint on Mr. Ramoji Rao’s coup activities including Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination and communal rivals provocation onto the desk of Mr. PV Narasimha Rao, the then PM of India. To approach him I started to search ways to secure his appointment.

In the part of my searching, one day I visited Mr. Rayapati Samba Siva Rao, an MP of Guntur district. I was familiar with him in the context of my factory inauguration, in 1989 by Smt. Kumud Ben Joshi, the then Governor of AP. By that time I had good terms with his younger brother Mr. Rayapati Srinivas Rao, the then ZPP Chairman. With this introduction, I had met him at his residence, Hyderabad. I told him about the then CM Mr. N. Janardhana Reddy’s immorality and my complaint to CM about RTC, as a testing. I didn’t reveal about Mr. Ramoji Rao and his activities.

I wanted to reveal about Mr. Ramoji Rao after knowing his motives about Mr. N. Janardhana Reddy, the then CM of AP. I raised the topic of CM’s immorality and asked Mr. Rayapati Samba Siva Rao why he didn’t bring it to the notice of PM of India. He said as, “They can corrupt even God.”

I thought that Mr. Rayapati Samba Siva Rao was not right choice to reveal.

Next I tried to approach Mr. YS Raja Sekhara Reddy, the then MP of Cuddaph and the present CM of AP, at his residence, at Banjara hills, Hyderabad. I paid 2 to 3 visits to him. First time when I met him in his office room, he was making a phone call to request Home dept. secretary to transfer a police Sub Inspector from pulivendula or Cuddaph, who was troubling him and his fellow men. I understood that he was struggling in Mr. N. Janardhana Reddy’s ruling time. I explained him about my complaint on APS RTC dispute to the CM, Mr. N. Janardhana Reddy and requested him to help me. He said that he would try to do so. I felt satisfaction as he didn’t say like Mr. Rayapati Samba Rao. I decided to meet him again because he didn’t say negative dialogue or support to corruption.

Next time I met him at his residence, Hyderabad. That day, an old poor woman met him to thank him as he helped her to get operation and free and good treatment in Govt. hospital. I felt confident and I reminded him my request. This time I told him that I was staying with my friend who was working as sub editor in Enadu. I observed that his face expression was something strange when I said about Enadu. Then he paid much interest to my request, and tried over phone to contact secretariat to enquire about my complaint on APS RTC to CM. He said that he could follow up it.

Third time I met him at Cuddaph. When I reached his residence at Cuddaph, along with my younger brother, the father of Mr. YS Raja Sekhara Reddy, Mr. Raja Reddy received me. I clearly remember that, on that day the elections for co-operative societies were going on. Mr. YS Raja sekhara Reddy was busy in those elections. But Mr. Raja Reddy informed his son over card less phone in front of me and said, “That girl of Guntur batteries unit came to see you. Come.”

Immediately, within 15 minutes, I heard that Mr. YS Raja Sekhara Reddy reached home by leaving lunch outside in the part of election program. Within these 15 minutes, Mr. Raja Reddy offered me lunch. But I refused it with courtesy. They sent coffee to me. I felt satisfaction because they remembered my reference and me.

Mr. YS Raja Sekhara Reddy received me in his office room, by taking care as if to receive a secret from me. Within 10 minutes, I explained what I know about Mr. Ramoji Rao, what I was suspecting him and requested Mr. YSR to bring this issue to PM of India. He said as “Do you have any proof with you?” I said, “Nothing”. Clearly, I observed some disappointment with him. He insisted me to bring proof to my claim. He said, “Without proof we can’t do anything. Nobody will believe us. If we have any proof, then we can proceed.” I observed little bit of hope and desire for proofs in his eyes. I expressed my helplessness to bring proofs. He expressed his helplessness. I took leave from him and left that place. Before leaving, again he advised me to fetch proof about Mr. Ramoji Rao’s activities.

With all these, I felt satisfaction that I can bring the issue to the notice of PM of India. I thought that nobody would watch me as a mad girl. The issue what I’m saying was believable.

Hence, I left for New Delhi in the last week of May 1992. By that time, I didn’t know what Mr. YSR would do if I give any proof to him. But now, i.e. after 16 years, I suspect him that he might try to use such proofs if any that I could produce, for the sake of his own career. I can say this because Mr. YSR is playing a strange role, which I’m not able to understand in my case i.e. regarding organized harassment on us by Mr. Ramoji Rao. I enclosed complete details at the ending of this writings including logical, documentary and circumstantial proofs.

The Episode of Boffors in the Coup

In 1985, elections, Congress party achieved an extreme majority as 500+ seats. What I remember was 502 or 504 seats in the parliament in which the total seats were 532. Like that, the sympathy on the murder of Smt. Indira Gandhi had swept out all other political parties as per the comment of the then media. But the truth is – It was not only the sympathy on her killing, it was the respect, affections, love and affection on her from Indians. Such emotions, love and effections were expressed on Rajiv Gandhi. He could motivate the public with his freedom run, etc programs, dreaming about advanced India in technical field etc speeches. He had taken step to talk with Punjab terrorists and their leaders like Longowala, immediately he occupied PMO at South Block. He visited Punjab in bulletproof car to mobilize it. Finally, he succeeded to make a compromising package with Longowala. But with in 2 or 3 months of this peace treaty Mr. Longowala was killed by his fellow terrorists who opposed to continue in India as Punjab state and who wanted to form Khalistan. Utterly the coup makers i.e. CIA, ISI, Ramoji Rao and their supporters like media were behind this. On the other hand, the media had put a name to Rajiv as Mr. Clean, as in the part of their coup strategy. When the Boffers dispute was exposed out, the same media roared on it. As a base to these critics, they popularized the surname as Mr. Clean.

In fact, behind the Boffers story, about which Mr. NTR and Enadu used to criticize as rusted guns, is utter coup.

In this coup, total role or main role was of Sonia Gandhi the transplanted spy i.e. agent of coup makers in India.

Naturally, any husband will trust his wife. Unless he trusts her, he won’t live with his wife. Naturally, any husband will consult his wife to get moral support in his crises, in his troubles and in his problems. Naturally, any husband will share his feelings, experiences, motives and needs with his wife, as she is his life partner.

Here this Videsi wife i.e. Italian woman Sonia influenced her husband as “To lead the party, to take donations from Corporate Companies is not wrong. In western countries, all the political parties and politicians used to do so”. In fact, this western philosophy is a positive caption to corruption. To lead the party, the party will accept donations from public including businessmen and companies. But in exchange offer, the party Govt. won’t give any business or contracts to the companies who had given donations to the party or party leaders.

There was news on media as Mr. Rajiv Gandhi had accepted the Boffer’s issue by saying that “To lead the party, people and companies used to give donations and party used to accept such donations. Like that only we also accepted donations from Hinduja etc”. While compare with the experience of the coup makers i.e. CIA, ISI, Ramoji Rao and their agents like media people and Sonia Gandhi, the experience of Rajiv Gandhi was very less. When compare with them, Rajiv Gandhi was like a kid. With his in-experience, innocence about traps and coups, Rajiv Gandhi had fallen in Boffers dig and as per the media especially for Enadu; he turned from Mr. Clean position to Mr. Cheat.

But with this experience, he became alert and awaritive about coups. He might think that his wife’s advice was due to her Western attitude. He didn’t suspect her as an agent of CIA. Like that, he was lucky enough as death is better than to know the own wife herself had played coups on himself. Like that, he was lucky enough to receive death rather to know about the cheat of loving wife in life.

Any way, with the experience of Boffers dispute, Mr. Rajiv Gandhi might prevent to discuss the issues and consult with her. He gradually learnt how to tackle the issues being politician. For such, he gradually depended up on the old, experienced and elder politicians, i.e. the colleagues and ex colleagues of his mother Smt. Indira Gandhi. Gradually he was following the guidance of such experienced elders. That’s why only in 1989, when Congress lost majority, he decided to sit in opposition place in parliament. Actually, no other party gained the full and sufficient majority to form Govt. on its own. That to Congress turned as the biggest party in the house of Lok Sabha. In spite of this, he decided to sit in opposition. Like that, he followed the experienced elders’ guidance. If he consults his wife, Sonia being Western personality or being transplanted agent she could advice him as “To continue the career in politics, to take support from other parties is not wrong. In western countries, all the political parties and politicians used to do so.”

This I can say as she done the same after 2004 election, to form UPA Govt. at New Delhi.