The episode of DVS Karna

Dhana Veera Sura Karna, Sri Krishna Pandaveeyam and Virata Parvam etc, Mr. NTR and other coup supporters like him had shown in their movies as Duryodhana criticized the birth of Vyasa Maharishi, Druthrashtra and PanduRaja, Vidura and Pandavas. Such that they had shown that Duryodhana as worst than he was in Maha Bharatham but the presentations of this character in those movies was as if he was more frank, great with self respect, good and had no emotions i.e. arishadwargas as jealousy, pride etc. A hero worship almost was built to Duryodhana and positive image to Dushta Chatushtyam i.e. Duryodhana, Dussasana, Karna and Sakuni. Another propaganda about Duryodhana was, about his temple at Kerala state. I don’t know where it was located actually. But the then propaganda was as if Duryodhana was more fair and frank enough, he was not a hypocrite like Dharma Raja. Dharma Raja and other pandavas were crucked, they were capable to pretend good and obedient by keeping their evil nature in hidden. To project such, so many Prakshipthams, scripts, dialogues the coup makers and their supporters created in cinemas, books etc media. I’ll try to give detail description regarding this coup.

In fact, the scriptwriter of the movie Dana Veera Sura Karna was Konda Veeti Venkata Kavi, a Sanskrit scholar. Mr. NTR had made him to accept the proposed of script writing, with good afford. Mr. Kondaveeti Venkata Kavi was a well-known atheist. When an atheist writes the script of an epic story, it is natural that such presentation of un accomplishment in the dialogues and in the script. Another thundering light was that Mr. Kondaveeti Venkata Kavi was ‘The then principal to Govt. Sanskrit Collage’. That was the level of coup on Hinduism. Can any atheist in Allah occupy any higher seat in any Islam related institute? Can any atheist in Jesus Christ occupy any higher seat in any Christian related institute? But it is easy by Government in case of Hindu related institutes.

Actually same strategy, the coup makers and their supporters followed in the case of Ramayanam also, by propagating Sri Rama, Lakshmana, Sita etc positive characters as hypocrites, exhibiting positive nature by hiding the evil nature and Raavana, Kumbhakarna, Surpanakha, Vaali etc negative characters as frank and fair enough to express their evil nature. By the way, strategically and successfully they succeeded in presenting the negative characters of the Indian epics are truthful, than the positive characters.

In fact, this is the crooked nature and Thamasa Budhi. In Moksha Sanyasa Yogam, 18-32 slokam in Bhagavad Geetha explains this to us in very clear manner.