Thursday, April 23, 2009
Complaint to C.I. of Police, reg. Fake Phone call
09:16:20 Hrs,
Tuesday,
Sri Sailam
To,
The Circle Inspector of Police,
Sri Sailam.
Respected sir,
Sub:
Complaint against Mr. Ramanayya, attender on contract to Dy. Executive Officer Mr.Krishnayya garu, about his threatening on me with fake phone call – reg.
******************
I, Mrs. Y. Adi Lakshmi, W/o. Lenin B. Yadla, resident of room No. 10, C.V.C.,1st floor, Sri Sailam bring the following to your kind notice with a request to take action on Mr. Ramanayya, room No.4,C.V.C. and to make justice to us.
At Challa Venkayya Choultry [C.V.C.], 18 families are residing 9 on ground floor and 9 on 1st floor. Mr. Ramanayya and others had cut off the valve of the sintex O.H. water tank of ground floor with axe saw after adjusting the full water pressure to them and with their corruptive methods; they managed stand taps near their rooms. This was happened 1-year back, and all of us, the people on 1st floor suffered without water.
Hence on behalf of 9 families, I lodged the complaint on to the desk of E.O. on 31-03-`06 and consecutively we as a group approached A.E., Mr. G.M.R. and E.E.
Mr. Rami Reddy on 06-04-`06 with oral and written complaints and request. After watching the pressure droppings, they removed stand taps and sent water tanker as temporary solution and they promised us for permanent solution.
Mean while there were bulk transfers in the Devasthanam. So that we are waiting with patience for the settle of staff. But yesterday i.e. on 08-05-`06 around
5:30 P.M. Mr. Ramanayya brought Mr. Naik contract labor in water works[in previous also, by taking money this man only had arranged two stand taps [un authorized] for them as per their own claim], Mr.Rajesh the new A.E. of water works and installed one stand tap. We did not objected the A.E.`s authority, but we requested him to watch the water inlet into our tank and we as a group, tried our level best to explain our problem with a request to solve.
Exactly, at that time, A.E., Mr. Rajesh had given me the cell phone of Mr. Ramanayya and told me that their D.E.O., Mr.Krishnayya was on the line. When I received the call, the voice on the phone said ``what? Why are you showing wickedness i.e. zulum on all other by saying complainting to E.O. etc.? By showing mercy, I had allotted room to you. What is your nonsense? Who ever got water, they fetch it. What is the pain to you?”
I shocked with that and by trying to convince him, I told him on phone `as a group we requested your officials, how it could be `wickedness i.e. zulum`? and I requested my co-resident Mr. Poorna chandrmachary Dy. Head Master in Zilla Parishat School as they also victims, to attend the call. When he started to explain, Mr. Rajesh, A.E., had taken the cell and concluded the call.
Sir, I know Mr. Krishnayya garu and I met him at his office to express my thankfulness after allotment of my room in September 2004. I remember his voice, accent and the way of talking. That to as a higher official, nobody will react in such a way by supporting totally one group and others to suffer. When we approached E.E., A.E., they also tried to solve the water problem and to provide water to everybody.
That’s why I suspect that Mr. Ramanayya had given a fake phone call on the name of Dy.E.O. Mr.Krishnayya. But why he targeted me I don`t know; because as a group we approached the higher authorities. In previous, the families of Mr. Ramanayya, Mr. Nagi Reddy Thota mali, Mr. Veera Reddy, Security guard and Mr. Mahesh himself, contract labor used nasty tongue and we complainted to E.E. so that he warned them to behave gently. Once or twice they threaten me that they can close my school. I don`t know who is behind this, but Mr. Ramanayya and others harassing me target fully.
In due course, they are threatening me with fake phone calls. If I fear about it, what is guarantee that he won`t threaten me on behalf of some other to give money or some thing? Is it not a criminal brain?
Hence, I request your good self to enquire into this matter and to take action on Mr. Ramanayya for this fake phone call threatening.
Sir, on the other hand, if Dy.E.O, himself had given that phone call, how could an administrative request and an administrative complaint on dispute be `Wickedness or Zulum`? What is the reason to scold me like this?
Sir, once again, I request your good self to take action on this matter.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely,
Y. Adi Lakshmi,
09-05-`06
Our Address:
Mrs. Y. Adi Lakshmi,
W/o. Lenin B. Yadla,
Room No.10,
Challa Venkayya Choultry,
Sri Sailam.
Cell No. 9440 971265.
***********END****************
Complaint to E.O. with Topography
07:30:00 Hrs,
Friday,
Sri Sailam
To,
The Executive Officer,
Sri Sailam.
Respected sir,
Sub:
Complaint against Mr. Mahesh, Mr. Nagi Reddy, Mr. Ramanayya [Contract labor] and Mr. Veera Reddy [Security guard, Balaji Securities] and Mr. Adam [Craft teacher, Z.P. High school]-reg.
**************
I, Mrs. Y. Adi Lakshmi, resident in Room No. 10, Challa Venkayya Satram, bring the following to your kind notice with a request to solve the problem at your earliest.
In Challa Venkayya Choultry 17 families are residing, 8 families on ground floor and 9 families on 1st floor, totally 18 Rooms are here in this choultry. On terrace, the Devasthanam had provided two sintex water tanks. As per the slope of terrace floor, the tank of ground floor is little bit down than that of first floor. Hence the water flow is much into the ground floor tank. To manage the water pressure and to stop the water over flow when the tanks full, the Devasthanam had arranged 2 valves on each tank.
But the ground floor residents reference cited above, had cut off the valve on the ground floor tank with axa, after it was adjusted fully to flow into their tank, by claiming that Mr. G.M.R., A.E. water supply had adviced them to do so. It was happened after oneyear back. We did not complain to any officer.
After that Mr. Mahesh contract labor [his father Mr. Naga Mallayya was
Ex E.E., now retired] with his reputation fixed a tap on floor to the pipe which supply water to O.H. tanks, so that the pressure had dropped like any thing, and hence single drop of water did not supplied to us. When the water problem was severe, we approached Mr. Rami Reddy, E.E. and then the problem was solved for some time. Later that tap was removed.
But once again, after one year, two days back, Mr. Mahesh tried to fix tap there. We are giving entire topography for your ready reference. At that time we warned the plumber, as we will complaint to higher authorities, they stopped the trial.
Here, the ground floor people are growing gardens not as hobby but for business, they are selling flowers to coconut vendors and vegetables to other.
Sir, we don`t mind if they are capable to do business and earn money. But for their business sake, they should not trouble others, they should not suffer others. For their gardens sake, they are not allowing 9 families to have even drinking water. Is it humanity? At the back ground of cottage No.64, [occupant is Mr. Adam], Devasthanam had provided a valve. When it rotated to one direction, full water flow will be there for them. By keeping several meters of tube they are watering the gardens. Same case with Mr. Nagi Reddy, Tota mali [contract Labor], Mr. Ramanayya [attender to Mr. Krishnayya, D.E.O., contract labor], and Mr. Veera Reddy [security guard, Balaji securities].
There was an unauthorized tap at the back yard of cottage No.66. Same Valve- Tap managements and pipe watering to gardens is there. One more cottage No.67, of Mr. Markhandeyulu is in this same lane. There is huge flower and vegetable garden in their house. We [all 9 families on the first floor] put several requests to them but in vain.
From the ground floor water tank, there is water connection to cottage No.69 [the occupant is Mrs. M. Madhavi, Bhramari school] had double connection to their O.H. Tanks. Like that, every body has their own solutions and gardens, on the other hand all other cottages around us, their O.H. Tanks used to overflow almost every day. But the occupants of 1st floor C.V.C., we i.e. 9 families’ people are suffering even for drinking water. Every summer same experience. Every day same problem.
They won`t give pressure and the ground floor people won`t leave the valve. Hence, no water to tanks. 9 families on 1st floor and 4 families on the other side of ground floor will face the water problem like any thing. Sir, we are not asking about the water supply on festival days like Siva rathri and Ugadi. We are requesting you to solve the water problem on normal days.
Sir, when we requested orally to either E.E. or D.E., they solved our problem for time being. But we request your good self on behalf of 9 families to solve the water problem of ours which is created by others with humanity and permanently.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely,
Y.Adi Lakshmi,
31-03-`06.
******END**********
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Complaint on 7th Class Result , 2004
19-05-`04,
06:00:00 Hrs,
Wednesday,
Sri Sailam
To,
Sri Y.S.R. Garu,
Hon`ble C.M. of A.P,
Hyderabad.
Respected sir,
Sub:
Our complaint against EAMCET -2000 Ranks disputes done by Corporate Colleges and consecutive complaints about organized herrosment on us by them –reg.
Ref:
Our personal meet with your good self on 21-03-2001
********************
I, Mrs. Y. Adi Lakshmi, Lecturer in Physics bring the following to your kind
notice with a request to make justice to us immediately.
With reference cited above we brought the dispute of EAMCET 2000 rank fixing done by Corporate Colleges as getting ranks in their favor and seizing the other`s ranks to C.M.`s peshy on 28-05-2000.
After that in the due course, the local colleges, with local supports harassed us organizing with the help of police and other departments at Surya pet, Nalgonda dist. At that moment, nobody had given house to us on rent and the then owners demanded us to vacate the house immediately against the terms. Police supported them. With strategies like A.P. Transco by claiming 49,300/-Rs. Bills eerier against nothing, disconnected our power connection etc they harassed us in all passable ways. We approached S.P. of Nalgonda several times. And we approached the then C.M. Mr. Chandra
Babu Naidu on 20-03-`01. After meeting C.M. Peshy officials, we understood the range of fraud from C.M. Peshy to Corporate Colleges. We met you on 21-03-`01 at your home, Jubilee hills for moral support.
With kindness, you extended help to recommend local politician to help us. Because we could not survive there, we left the issue, we left our assets, furniture everything, and we struggled for two years here and there.
Later we restarted life at Sri Sailam, Kurnool dist., by starting a pre-school and private tuition centre. Here also the private schools are managing fraud. So that here the competitive school by name `Wisdom` with corruption they got very good result and our result were seized by miscorrecting the answer papers of our student in 7th class.
When I taught for Intermediate student in June 2003 also, they did same. Against it, the parent of student had complained to C.M. Peshy but they did not respond.
Sir, I`m not questioning the result what ever they got by patronizing fraud. But they should not kill the carrier of other students and other institutes. When this happened in EAMCET, I turn to Inter & 10th class. When they encroached there, I turn to 7th class & pre school. But now the same fraud is repeating. Then how can we live? How the sincere working people can survive?
Hence, I request your good self to look into this fraud of hundreds of Cores of Rs per year and thousands of lives of youth.
For your reference, we can submit the records of the case EAMCET 2000 etc. whatever we have.
Once again, we request your good self to make justice to us immediately.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely,
Y. Adi Lakshmi,
19-05-`04.
Encl. for reference:
Our complaint to Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda in 2000 Our present student Reg. No. 61119 [7th class].
**********END**********
The harassment of AP Transco, Sri Sailam
09-11-`04,
10:50:40 Hrs
Sri Sailam
To,
The A.E,
A.P. Transco,
Sri Sailam.
Respected sir,
Sub:
Complaint about the bill i.e., Power charges to service No. 729, in Room No.10 – Reg
********************
Here with me, Mrs. Y. Adi Lakshmi, occupant of Room No.10 in Challa
Venkayya Satram, which was allotted to us by Sri Sailam Devasthanam, bring the following to your notice to rectify the mistake.
In Room No.10, the service No.729, your employees did not issue the bill. Instead of it, they issued us the bill of service No.598 which is at Room No.18 in which we stayed in previous. In fact, the Room No.18 is occupied by Sri Sridharnath garu [paricharak] and their consumption is 28 units. Your employees issued the bill for that 28 units, category B to us and they are saying that they will issue our consumption of 87 units bill to them.
How it is possible sir? How they are liable to our consumption and we are liable to their consumption? If any disputes happen over their meter service No.589 are we liable for it? What logic is this?
Our consumption for these bi-months [Sep. and Oct.] is 87 units and there are 28 units, what ever the consumption we enjoyed in this Room No.10, which was occupied by us on 15-09-`04[Sep. 15th 2004]. Then how the Room No.18 is liable for it? How can the previous service No. of Room No.18 can follow us? Whatever the service No, consumption is relates to premises, isn`t sir.
Hence, we request your good self to issue the bill to our service No. in Room No.10, to enable us to pay the bill.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely,
Y. Adi Lakshmi.
Note:
A straight question sir?
Service No. is relate to Premises? Or Occupant?
*************END***************
Sri Sailam Complaints -06
07-01-05,
17:54:40 Hrs,
Friday,
Sri Sailam
To,
The Assistant Engineer,
A.P. Transco,
Sri Sailam.
Sub:
Complaint against your disputes with our service No.795 to S.E,Kurnool –reg
**************
I, Mrs. Y. Adi Lakshmi, A.P. Transco consumer with service No.795 at Sri Sailam bring the following to your notice for your information sake.
Last bill to my service you had given `Under Category -1.` this bill you have issued the same under category -2. On which grounds you have charged our service under commercial? Is it your personal authority to do so? Am I a commercial tax payer or business tycoon? After all I`m running a private and pre-school. The Government it self is encouraging education, so that after certain strength only, it will demand us for recognition and commerciality. I got the room allotment under such private personal ground but not under commercial.
Then on which documentation, you are charging my power service under commercial? That to, the same service comes under category -1 in one month and under category -2 in 2nd bill and vice versa in next. Are you playing games with us? When we were residing in Room No.18 of Mr.Sridhar on friendly base, you had done the same drama. Since we did not like to trouble him, we paid that in-justice bills. When we got allotment of Room No.10 in the same Challa Venkaiah Satram, after we had shifted we farwarded a letter to you since the meter was not working here. You replaced the old meter with a new one and inconsecutive bill you argued that the service No.598 of Room No.18 will follow me to Room No.10. I put another letter about such nonsensical administration. After that, you had issued the bill to us with service No.795 of Room No.10 under category -1 dated 10-11-’04. Now, next bill again you have issued it under category -2. Are you playing with my service musical chair? On behalf of whom you are harassing us like this?
If you meant money from some body as corruption, you do favors such as meter disputes etc to him, it is your sin. But by taking money from some one and doing harassment to his enemy or competitor, it is crime. What is the difference of this sin from a hired criminal`s activities?
Hence I am going to lodge complaint with police department under organized harassment which is already on the desk of Chief Minister Peshy. Because I have experience with your A.P. Transco at Surya pet, Nalgonda district as they issued the bill to my house for Rs.49,300/- to harass me after taking money as corruption from my competitive college. It seems your harassment.
I have only 40 students and running pre-school in my house varanda. So that, only one tube light and fan are using for kids. My monthly consumption also just 40 to 50 units. How it could be commercial? In such case in Sri Sailam for every 10 houses, one house is at least doing tailoring, dress and sarees sale, Mixe , fan etc repairing and beauty parlors, along with meter disputes. Then what is your sincere reaction on this issue?
Hence regarding all of these disputes, I`m bringing to the kind notice of your S.E., Kurnool along with all evidences.
Once again being customer, I`m demanding your response to my question on which grounds you are charging my power bill as commercial? On behalf of whom, your are harassing us?
Thanking you.
Yours consumer,
Y. Adi Lakshmi.
07-01-`05.
***********END***************
Sri Sailam complaints –07
31-01-`05,
11:25:05 Hrs,
Monday,
Sri Sailam
To,
The Superintendent Engineer,
A.P. Transco,
Sri Sailam.
Respected sir,
Sub:
Complaint against A.E., Sri Sailam Mr.Vivekananda Swamy about his harassment on us – reg
Ref:
Our complaint against organized harassment on us dt: 18-05-`04 on to the desk of C.M.
**********************
With reference cited above, I Mrs. Y. Adi Lakshmi, resident of Sri Sailam brings the following to your kind notice with a request to do the needful at your earliest.
I am running a pre-school along with my husband in my house [a room and varandah], which was allotted, to us by Sri Sailam Devastanam. I have 25 kids and 14 private tuition students. But your A.E., Mr. Vivekananda Swami harassing us.
His harassment process is; he is issuing power bills to us one time under category-1 and one time under category -2 like musical chairs. For the same service No, first bill he issued under category-2, 2nd bill under category-1 and next under category-2 and so on. For your ready reference I`m enclosing the bills to you. When we shifted our residence after getting allotment from Devasthanam, this man argued with us that the service No. of cottage No. 18, C.V.C. to present Room No.10. When we asked him in written as the service No. relates to premises or occupant, then only he issued the bill with the service No.795 of room No.10.
Sir, how our service comes under category -2? I am neither commercial tax payer nor commercial educationalist. As on un-employee, we are running a pre-school for which there is no need to take registration or recognition or any other permissions from Government. For your ready reference, I`m enclosing the room allotment order issued by Devasthanam to us. Our consumption is only 40 to 50 units per month. How it could be a commercial consumption? Before entering into teaching line, I was an industrialist, established a small scale industry, so that I am some what awaritive about category-2. Hence I requested him on which documentation he charged us under category-2 in written. But he is making different arguments at each and every time.
Sir, being EAMCET Lecturer, I lodged complaint against EAMCET ranks disputes done by Corporate Colleges as rank fixing such as match fixing in cricket in 2000. Since that year, I was organizing harassed by them. Hence I personally approached C.M. Sri Y.S. Raja sekhara Reddy at Lake-view guesthouse on 22-05-`04, I lodged the complaint. During such harassment, at Surya pet, Nalgonda [Dist.] the A.P. Transco local authorities harassed me by issuing the current bill of Rs.49, 300/- to my house and disconnected service against Rs. 85/- due. At that time, S.E., Nalgonda had solved the problem. Similar harassments this A.E. of Sri Sailam is making.
Hence, I request your good self to look into the matter and make justice to us. I`m enclosing the necessary evidence for your ready reference.
Sir, once again, I request you to make justice to us.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely,
Y.Adi Lakshmi,
31-01-`05.
Copy:
C.M,
Sri Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy,
Samatha,
Secretariat,
Hyderabad.
**************END***************
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Sri Sailam complaints-1,2
08-08-03
06:50:05
Friday,
Sri Sailam
To,
The Secretary,
Inter Board,
Hyderabad.
Respected sir,
Sub:
Request to accept our requisition for Xerox copies of Inter 1st year Physics [advanced supplementary, June `03] sent on 11-08-`03 i.e. Last date of receiving – reg.
***********************
I, Mr. Sai Kiran, Hall Ticket No. 2324595 was issued the marks memo on 07-08-`03 and the consequent days i.e., from 08-08-`03 to 10-08-03 were holidays. On
11-08-`03 we approached Principal, Govt. Jr. College, Sri Sailam Project, he told that 11-08-`03 was last date to reach the requisition for Xerox copies to Inter Board. On personal request he considered to give it and hence we far worded them to your Board with D.D. No.
456162 for Rs. 600/-. I had taken good coaching and attempted in good manner, but I got only 13 marks and failed at which my coaching institute also felt surprise.
Hence, we want to have Xerox copies to find out where we got failure.
Hence, I request you’re good self to accept my requisition for Xerox copies of answer sheets of 1st year Inter Physics in advanced supplementary, June `03.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely,
K. Sai Kiran.
My Address:
K. Sai Kiran,
S/o. K.Swamy,
Sri Mallikharjuna Photo studio,
Sri Sailam, Kurnool Dist.
*********END************
Sri Sailam Complaints –02
01-09-`03,
10:25:00 Hrs,
Monday,
Sri Sailam
To,
The Deputy Secretary [Exams],
Board of Inter mediate Education,
Hyderabad.
Respected sir,
Sub:
Complaint about answer sheet No.394, 1st year Physics in advanced Supplementary - regarding
Ref:
Your letter No.R.C.727/Pc/ASE/2003, dated 18-08-`03.
****************
I, Mr. K. Sai Kiran, regd. No. 2324595 attempted advanced supplementary in June 2003, from centre No. 2620, Govt. Junior College, Sri Sailam Project.
I had taken good coaching for this, done good industry and had written in good manner in exams. But I got 10 marks and failed. That’s why I suspected something wrong due to local competitions in between tuition centers and hence I wanted to locate where my failure was. That’s why I requested for Xerox copies through Principal on 11-08-`03 and got them through speed post on 20-08-03 directly from your good self to my residence address.
As per the Xerox copies of my answer sheets also I have to get marks for
Q.No. 19,17,14,12,11,9,7,6,5,4 and 3; as per the liberal consideration of examiner who corrected my answer paper. If he consider the answer very strictly he should not allot marks for the Q. No.20 and 12; other wise he have to allot for Q.No.19, 17, 14, & 9, 7,6,5,4 and 3 also. The answer booklet is enclosed for your ready reference.
As my case background: - I attempted exams in March 2003 for which I got total failure. That I accepted, because I did not get right coaching which was not available by that time so that I could not write exams in good manner. But this time by luck I got good coaching and done well. But due to local tuition centers competition some disputes happened here what we suspect. The local competitors to my tuition centre are College Development Committee members. So there is high possibility to have the support of internal college staff. The staff behavior also lead my parents, my tuition Lecturer and my self to this conclusion.
Sir, I bring this to your notice, that what ever may be the competitions in between colleges, schools and tuition centers, they should not make a student like me, as a scapegoat and they should not kill a student career.
Hence, I request your good self to look into the matter and to locate the dispute and justice me.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely,
K. Sai Kiran,
Parents` sign: K. Swamy
Tuition Lecturer sign: Y. Adi Lakshmi
Copy: [1] To the Commissioner & Secretary,
Board of Intermediate Education,
Hyderabad.
[2] C.M. Cell,
Secretariat,
Hyderabad.
********END***********
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Complaint to Chief Justice, AP
Surya pet complaints ---23
30-03-2001,
10:40:20 Hrs,
Thursday,
Hyderabad
To,
His Excellency,
Sri Satyabratha Sinha,
Hon`ble Chief Justice,
High court, A.P.
Respected sir,
Sub:
1. Request to bring the truth in the disputes of IPE [2000] as paper leak, EAMCET 2000 as purchasing of ranks –reg.
2. Request to protect us from social boycott & organized harassment from Private Jr. College Managements Union since I lodged the complaint against their disputes in Inter & EAMCET 2000 to C.M. Of A.P. on 28-05-2000. We are being harassed severely from Aug. 2000. Since 15 days power & water supply was disconnected to my house & from 19-03-2001 it was locked. So that we as a family of 3 members including 6 years baby residing in Bus-stand, Hyderabad begging your good self to make justice.
*********************
I, Mrs. Y. Adi Lakshmi, EAMCET Lecturer, 35 years aged, female, my husband Mr. Lenin Babu Yadla, EAMCET formulae book publisher & seller, 35 years aged, and my daughter `Geeta Priya` [6 years age] bring the following prayer to your kind notice to make immediate justice.
With 9 years experience in Corporate Colleges like Vikas, Excel & in B centre colleges like in Surya pet, Nalgonda district, I`m continuing as EAMCET Lecturer & I bagged 126 Engg. Rank, 22 good ranks on single hand teaching & 10th Medicine rank as one of Lecturer in team. With this background, as a lecturer we can analyze the capacity & I.Q. of students so that their result. When the students at Surya pet without coaching, industry & relevant I.Q. secured ranks such as 2288 in EAMCET 2000. I suspected the dispute of ranks purchasing which was happening in Corporate College as a secret. Then I brought all of this to Chief Minister`s notice along with Hall Ticket No. of students on 28-05-2000.
I heard that there is a price of Rs. 1.00 lack for Engg. Rank, Rs. 2 lack for Medicine rank. So that Rs. 50 lacks was traded over Suryapet market. This is the dispute of hundreds of crores of rupees per annum all over A.P.
After lodging the complaint, we were peaceful up to Inter supplementary exams September 2000. Then my difficulties were started. All of such organized harassment, we brought to the notice of C.M. & S.P. of Nalgonda from time to time. These college managements managed the local police and private people, are harassing us in all possible ways. There was a talk that my house owner had taken Rs. 1.00 lack to harass us. The truth must know to God and after effort to court. Regarding this harassment S.P. of Nalgonda had registered case against Suryapet police ref. C.No. 60/CC Cell / Nalgonda on 25-02-2001. But the local police are not taking any action on the persons on whom I put complaint & on the other hand, the harassment on us is getting severe day by day. About all of these harassment continuities, I mailed petitions to C.M. & S.P., Nalgonda along with available evidences in the course of 10 months of time. Due to financial crises I`m not able to produce the Xerox copy bunch to your good self but I produced it to C.M. which was endorsed to Sri Lakshmi Narayana, OSD to C.M. on 20-03-2001 at secratereate. I`m furnishing some of them to you.
Here we are enclosing the analysis of case for your ready reference with a request to protect our lives from social boycott & organized harassment and to punish the guilty legally.
Sir, we prey you to spray your kind over a small family, which is facing bitter experiences without food and accommodation, stood on platform by bringing a dispute to Govt. notice.
Sir, what is my sin in bringing a dispute to Govt. notice. Including students & their parents supporting the disputes as ranks purchasing, mass copying etc. Where is the stop for these disputes? In the battle of with disputes, humanity had been defeated like anything. Unless the truth come out, the lives like ours could not be saved.
Hence, I request your good self to give the life to truth. I furnish the Hall Ticket No. of students who got Engg. & Medical ranks with money rather than knowledge & hard working.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely,
Y. Adi Lakshmi,
30-03-2001.
Lenin B. Yadla.
Encl: 1). Analyses of case.
********END*******
Analyses of case:
Disputes of ranks purchase in EAMCET 2000, Exam. Question Paper Leak in IPE 2000. C.M. petition dated 28-05-2000 to C.M. [encl.] ANL couriers Receipt. No. 18903250, Surya pet. à | Organized harassment by Private College Managements Union & Their Supporters. 1]. Our petition DT. 09-10-2000 to C.M., ANL Couriers receipt. No. 90044391 [Bhongiri] 2]. Our petition DT. 19-10-2000 to S.P., Nalgonda. In this, we complained that the private college Managements Union is harassing us by seizing my financial sources, driving me to high expenditure & nasty situations. Nobody is willing full to give house on rent to us where as present owners troubling us to vacate the house immediately, though we are paying rent as Rs. 2,100/- P.M. promptly. He responded with humanity and endorsed to note as ``The petitioner is being harassed by Triveni College authorities. She is not even allowed to take a house or rent. Take n/a. report`` to C.I., SRPT [Town]. |
SRPT. Police. Para [1] | AP Transco Para [2] | Postal Dept. Para [3] | House owner Smt. P. Bhagya Laxmi, Para [4] |
Ref:1].Our petition dt.09-10-2000to C.M. & S.P. 2].Our petition dt.29-11-2000 to C.M. & S.P. 3].Our petition dt.30-12-2000 to C.M. & S.P. 4].Our petition dt.25-01-2001 to C.M. & S.P. ^ ^ | Ref: 1].Petition dt.29-11-2000 to C.M.,S.P. & S.E. 2].Bill receipt No.185485; dt.11-12-2000 for 815/-Rs. 3].Bill receipt No.187490; dt.12-02-2000 for 93/-Rs. | Ref:1]. Covering letter from IIT, Chennai. 2]. Petition dt.05-01-2000 to C.M.
| Para [4] |
1].Receipt No; dt. 09-10-2000, No. 90044391, Bhongiri, ANL. 2].Receipt No; dt. 29-11-2000, No. 276879, Surya pet, ANL. 3].Receipt No; dt. 30-12-2000, No. 277036, Surya pet, ANL. | |||
Previous house owner: Madhu Sudhan Rao, Para [5] | Press club: Para [6] | Student Parents: Para [7] |
Para [5] | Ref: Bill No.862,dt.03-03-2001. | Ref: Receipt from students Parent for refund of fee. |
*****************************************
Para [1]:
C.I., Surya pet town responded positively on 19-10-2000 & within 19 days he shown redtapisam to me and pressured to write commitment to vacate the house within 3 months. When I remained about college harassment & nobody is giving house to me, he put deaf ear.
Para [2]:
In spite of several oral & written requests, A.P. Transco did not corrected the differences of Meter Vs Bill reading for consecutive 3 bills. So that we might liable for Rs.48, 300/-. When we put petition to S.E., December 2000, A.P.Transco, Surya pet, they rectified the bill & we paid the balance of Rs. 815/- on 12-12-2000. But again by claiming Rs.48, 300/- without issuing bill or Notice, Transco people disconnected the power on pole. After 3 days in dark we could restore Service after 1 hour rupture we got bill for Rs.93/-.
Para [3]:
Missing of IIT Hall Tickets to my students in postal dept. they theft my complaint to C.M. from ANL couriers, Surya pet, not taken any action on them w.r.t. to my complaint dt. 05-01-2001.
Para [4]:
our present house owner Mrs. P.Bhagya Lakshmi showing different reasons on every day, demanding us to vacate the house immediately within 5 months after accommodation, though we secured 1-year stay on oral at the time of accommodation. Though we explained our harassment process to them & police, nobody is hearing us. She is not accepting the rent, using vulgar tongue, not allowing milkman, & students to enter in to my house as we are staying on 1st floor, she stays in ground floor. She rejected the D.D. as we sent rent amount with the advice of Mr.K.Radha Krishna & Meela Satyanarayana [D.D. No. SCUB/12 No.100049]Sudha Bank, SRPT. Whom we approached to make justice in this matter as they are leading people at Surya pet, claiming that she has fear about D.D. [through regd. Post, we sent it receipt No.2332] on the other hand she approached, Mr.Naiyani Dayakar Reddy, Advocate to take caveat. We approached Sri Meela Satyanarayana [Congress leader], Sri GunagantiRamulu[TDP Leader], Sri K.V. Rama linga Reddy Advocate, Bar Council President, but she is not obeying any body`s voice. On 20-02-2001 she disconnected power supply & locked the house, with the help of D.S.P., [our petition dt.20-02-2001, receipt No.24] we could solved the problem. Again on 05-03-2001, she done same, but this time D.S.P. did not helped us. S.P., Nalgonda, registered Case No. C.No.60/ CC Cell/ Nalgonda 25-03-2001. Finally from 09-03-2001 we have no power & water supply. On 19-03-2001, she once again locked the house, till date we stood on road without accommodation & even a spare dress. Nobody is able to say her that is all illegal. I enclosed the petition copies for your ready reference. We were unable to approach Lok Adalat since the judge at Surya pet is on leave, up to 26-03-2000 as I was told by Sri K.V. Rama Linga Reddy, Advocate.
Para [5]:
Within 5 months we vacated the house of Madhu Sudhana Rao because he did not given service to us. At the time of vacation, he refused to repay our advance rent amount of 2 months Rs. 3,500/-. After 2 months effort we could got it.
Para [6]:
When we conducted, the press meet by paying Rs.100/- as receipt No.862, dt. 03-03-2001. Not a single word is published in any newspaper. When we sent fax to Enadu main office, Hyderabad, no response.
Para [7]:
On 19-11-2000 all of my IIT basic students [7 members] & EAMCET students [7 members] seized to come to the classes & one of student parent Mr. Sankar Reddy claimed me to refund the fee to him as all other students had stopped to come & I repaid the fee to him after collecting the receipt from them stating the same. Later one by one remaining students came to classes. Now the house owner is not allowing us to stay in house but students' parents demanding us to refund the fee as we bounced the classes.
Sir, is that not organized harassment?
I request you to take action legally or as per administration on guilty.
**************END*******************
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Surya pet complaint—5
12-11-2000,
16:40:10Hrs,
Sunday,
Hyderabad
To,
The Hon`ble Chief Minister,
Andhra Pradesh.
Respected Sir,
Ref:
1. Our complaint dated 28.05.2000 against Triveni Jr. College, Surya Pet, about their disputes in Inter Public March 2000 paper such as Leak & EAMCET 2000 such as purchasing of ranks – reg. 2. Our complaint dated 09-10-2000 against Triveni Jr. College authorities and their supporters about their social & financial harassment on us—reg.
3. Our complaint dated 19-10-2000 about same to S.P., Nalgonda.
Sub:
Request to protect us from the organized harassment of Triveni Jr. College authorities and Surya pet Town C.I. & S.I. of police - reg
*********************
With reference cited above I, Mrs. Y.Adi Lakshmi, Private Tuition Lecturer bring the following to your kind notice with a request to save our life & respects immediately.
As I approached the Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda with a request to protect us from the harassment, after observing everything, the Hon`ble Officer responded with humanity and asked me to meet C.I. of Surya pet Town. He made telephone to him & given a note on my complaint, which is enclosed for your ready reference.
When I approached C.I. Mr. A.M.Khan, he said welcome to me & he can solve all of my problems. He asked me whether he have to warn either my house owner or Triveni college authorities for which I said that I don`t know in which manner, he can solve, after all my request is to solve my problem & let me lead peaceful life. At the same time, I told him that I have faith on police.
For 20 days from 19-10-2000 to 07-11-2000 the C.I. & S.I. did not called me. But all of a sudden on 08-11-2000, they dealt me like 420 & declared that my house owner is innocent. So that, I have to vacate the house within 3 months. They pressured me to give such written commitment, which I enclose for your ready reference.
They claimed me that I`m not behaving well with them. But sir, I know how to respect higher officers & police officers. Before entering into teaching line, I was the manufacturer of Lead acid Batteries. I was supplier to APSRTC under the managing director of Sri H.J. DORA, to police Transport organization under the lead of Sri P.V. Naidu.
I came from respectable family & leading dignified life in society. By bringing a dispute to your kind notice am I became as 420? Is it my crime? Before lodging complaint to police, I was under undeclared social boycott. But now under declared social boycott. On whomever I quoted the organized harassment on me are showing grievance and hesitation on me. I`m not able to understand this since C.I. told me that he is doing secret enquiry on my complaint. In such case, how everybody knows it?
Sir, such that I lost faith on Surya pet Town C.I. & S.I. of police. I enclosed the list of events as date & time wise for your ready reference. I suspect that the nonstop enquiry will be there on me with rough treatment & no more enquiries will be there on my deponents.
Hence, I request your good self to lift this embracing enquiry on me from police C.I. and S.I. or advice me to withdraw my complaint.
Thanking You.
Yours sincerely,
Y. Adi Lakshmi,
12-11-2000.
Copy: The S.P., Nalgonda.
Enclosures:
1.List of events with date and time,
2. S.P. Note on my complaint,
3. Written commitment for vacating of house,
4. Receipt of rent.
*********END***********
Date & Time: (Around) | List of Events: |
09-10-20001. | I put complaint on to your table. |
10-10-2000 4:00 PM: 7:00 PM: | 1. I reached home. 2. Fake enquiries came and asked me about my camp. |
11-10-2000 6:30 AM: 5:00 PM: | 1. my house owner Mrs. Bhagya Lakshmi araised a controversial. 2. two students joined in IIT Basics Tuition along with Mr. Parameswar, Little Flower schoolteacher, attending for 3 days and left because of Study hours in school. |
18-10-2000 12:30 Noon: 6:30 PM: | 1. my house owner Mrs. Bhagya Lakshmi used vulgar tongue and her husband locked house door. So that I declared that I`m going to approach police dept. 2. I tried to approach D.S.P. at Surya pet & he was not available. |
19-10-2000 5:00 AM: 12:00 Noon: 5:30 PM: | 1. my house owner Mrs. Bhagya Lakshmi had gone to Guntur to drop her daughter at her in-law's house. 2. I approached S.P. at Nalgonda and after gone through the case Particulars, he responded with humanity and asked me to meet C.I. at Surya pet town. He made telephone to C.I. and given a note on my complaint. 3.I approached C.I. Mr. A.M.Khan & he said welcome to me and promised to solve my problems. He introduced S.I. Mr. B.R. Naik as that he can help me in his absence. He asked me whether he have to warn either Triveni College Krishna Reddy or House owner. I said that nothing is particular for me but I want to Lead peaceful life. So that to have help. He said that he could. |
21-10-2000 11:00 AM: | 1. My house owner`s husband Mr. Ratnam also gone on camp. |
22-10-2000 8:00PM: | 1. My house owner Mrs. Bhagya Lakshmi returned to home. |
23-10-2000 | 1. My house owner`s husband Mr. Ratnam returned to home. 2. Fake enquiry came from my ex-student along with my ex colleague& Committed to attend the classes. But did not. |
26-10-2000 9:00 AM: | 1. Mrs. Bhagya Lakshmi told send off to neighbors and given suggestions to Servant maid Nagamma with loud voice as she was going to Vijayawada. But gone to her chicken centre only. |
27-10-2000 5:30 AM: | 1. Mrs. Bhagya Lakshmi brought Mr. Soma Sekharam, advocate and he asked me what I had put on my complaint for which I replied that they can enquire In police station. |
03-11-2000 5:30 AM: | 1. Mrs. Bhagya Lakshmi, Mr.Ratnam used vulgar tongue and declared that they can through my belongings on to the road. Mr.B.R.Naik, the S.I. is her servant maid`s relative. So that no problem for her. She said, "You had studied degrees but you have no intelligence. You should not lodge complaints, instead of that you have to discuss the things and you have to compromise with others. You have the habit to pay visits around police station. In previous, you have the record as complained on Brilliant Junior College. You are lodging complaints on all. If you have dareness, go to police station. I have no fear". For this, I suspected something wrong somewhere. So that I remained in silence. |
05-11-2000:
| 1. All of IIT Basic students ceased to come to the classes as their tuition fee Final Installment due is on that date as per their commitment. [Till date, only one Student paid the fee and not all other are attending the classes. Almost same case in EAMCET.] |
07-11-2000: 11.00 AM: 7.30 PM: | 1. A man with Khaki uniform [without name and PC No. display on uniform] Declared his name as Mr.Saidulu came to my house on Mr. Ratnam`s vehicle and asked me to come to station as my house owner had lodged petition on S.I. table. So that, S.I. was calling me. Immediately I gone to station but sentry Mr. Ram Reddy told me that both C.I. & S.I. had gone to Nalgonda. So that I have to try after 5.00 P.M. 2. I made telephone to C.I. residence & explained everything over phone. He said that he don`t know it. So he can enquire that what happened & asked me to come on next day evening ie.08-11-2000 By 5.30 PM |
08-11-2000 4.00 PM: 4.30 PM: 6.00 PM: 6.25 PM: | 1. Another man with Khaki uniform [this time also no name and PC No. display on uniform] came to my house on my owner`s vehicle and said ``Call your husband. S.I. is calling him. `` When I said that we are coming after changing dress with in ten minutes, he did not allowed me. Hence, I suspected that my crucked enemy could kidnap my husband. Then I said that I`m the petitioner. So that, I can come but not my husband. 2. I took conformation of appointment from C.I. for 5.30 PM. 3. I approached C.I. at police station. He said to some P.C. ``Who said to these people to vacate the house? There is no such need until case closes. Convey this to your S.I. `` He told me that he heard that some petition is lodged against me on S.I. table, so I have to come after 10 minutes or on next day since S.I. was not available at that time. So I left from station. 4. I again approached station to meet S.I. since somehow I did not liked to post pone it for next day. At that time, my house owner was there. In his presence S.I. dealt me like 420 & said ``what? What is wrong I call you for Enquiry? Are you the Prime Minister of India? Why did you say that you could give a ring to C.I. when I called on you? `` With these dialogues, he enquired me. When I replied him that I suspected kidnap of my husband by my enemy hence after taking confirmation only I came to station. But they [both C.I. & S.I.] put Deaf ear to my arguments. C.I. declared that my deponents are their petitioners and both of we are equal to him. When I referred about Triveni college people Coup he asked my house owner Mr. Ratnam `` Is there anybody behind you? `` That man said ``No sir! `` C.I. said to me ``O.k. Madam, You know that there is nobody like that. It is your mistake that you did not taken written commitment from your house owners for 1-year stay at the time of accommodation. You took it on oral only. It is your fault. When I said, "If I ask like that who will give house to me?" He put deaf ear. "Within 3 months after public of this rupture who will give house to me?" He put deaf ear. Whatever Triveni Krishna Reddy said, within one year, C.I. said to me now within 20 minutes. He asked me `` Do you have controversial everywhere? `` I had nothing controversial with any of my previous house owner & neighbors before December 1999. After that only I`m facing troubles from all. When I explained this to him. He did not hear. When I brought the issue that all of IIT basic students are stopped to attend the classes C.I. asked me ``why? `` I said, "I don't know sir! If I ask them why they are not attending the classes, they will say that I'm not teaching them well. Like the issue of my house owner Mr. Ratnam, I told you that Mr. Ratnam had scolded with vulgar tongue. He said that he didn't. You are certifying that he is innocent. Where is the proof for paradox?" Then C.I. said he could understand my problem in words. But pressured me to give written commitment of vacate. Both C.I. & S.I. are certifying my house owner is uneducated. So that he is innocent. They are intelligent to earn money as 15 lacks within 15 years on chicken centre and finance. They can do power disputes & can charge 30/-Rs. from each tenant as nalla [water] charge where as the municipality charge is 40/-Rs only P.m. Then how can they are innocents? By bringing dispute to Govt. eye, how I became as 420. Sir, is every uneducated is innocent? In such case how uneducated Mr. Krishna Reddy the Hon`ble director of Triveni Jr. college, he is Non Medical Assistant i.e. Ward boy in leprosy ward of Govt. hospital was able to do disputes IPE paper leak, EAMCET ranks marketing and scholarship. In this juncture, I fear the same 20 minutes drama may repeat in case of Krishna Reddy also. Is this justice to me? |
******************END*********************
SURYA PET COMPLAINT -3
19-10-2000
Surya pet
To,
The Superintendent of Police,
Nalgonda.
Respected Sir,
Ref:
Our complaint dated 28.05.2000 against the disputes of Triveni Jr. Collage, In Inter Public, March 2000 Exams such as leak and EAMCET 2000 such as purchasing of ranks at Surya pet and about their other disputes to Hon`ble Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh.
Sub:
1.) Request to protect us from the social and financial harassment of M/s. Triveni Jr. College & their supporters – reg.
********************
With the reference cited above, we Mrs. Y.Adi lakshmi, Mr. Lenin B. Yadla private tuition lecturer at Surya pet bring the following to your kind notice with a request to make justice to us.
We lodged the complaint about the disputes of IPE & EAMCET 2000 Exams on to the table of Hon`ble Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh on 28.05.2000. We can understand the Government policy and hence we are waiting for the justice with patience. Meanwhile we are facing harassment from local people who are supporting these disputes.
Here at Surya pet the Private & Govt. educational field is under the control of private colleges managements union which is presided by Mr. Shashidhar Reddy, Correspondent of Triveni Jr. College and some of Govt. teachers who are the supporters to him. These people are the Godfathers of all disputes in education such as IPE, 10th class Exam paper leaks, Mass copying, impersonations and scholarship goalmals etc. As supporting this, in the management of almost of all schools & colleges at least one member is Govt. teacher.
With this back ground, they are harassing us financially & socially since we lodged the complaint against their disputes. By using their local pressures (by either force or fear), they are dropping our IIT basics & EAMCET students. Recently all of a sudden, our spoken English students' batch (15 students) stopped to come to the classes.
On the other hand, our house owner Mr. Ratnam & Mrs. Bhagya lakshmi are demanding us to vacate the house immediately with their support. Though, we secured oral commitment for 1-year stay in the house at the time of accommodation and we are paying rent promptly as Rs.2000/- as rent and Rs.100/- water charges per month. Just we occupied the house in middle of March 2000, within 5 months they are demanding us to vacate by showing different reasons daily. But no house owner is willing full to give house to us. If one or two are ready to give, but they are offering very high & non-reliable rents. Recently Mr. Chinta kuntla Narayana Reddy, the municipality tax employee had given such offer as 2,600/-Rs for single bad room portion. We never watched such abnormal rents at Surya pet.
Such same situation had arisen with our previous house owner Mr. Madhusudhana Rao, so that we shifted to this. Since he refused to repay our advance amount, we had secured help from police station only. That's why we offered to Mr. Rittman our present house owner to deposit the advance amount in police station to get settlement on the day of vacating house, but he is refusing and removing fixation, water taps etc. He locked door yester day & later his wife removed it & being local, he is threatening us.
Regularly the college managements sending fake enquiries to us and by knowing our motives, they are troubling us in all possible ways. Like this, they are seizing our income and dragging us high expenditure and nasty situations.
Like this, we are affecting the undeclared social boycott. In this juncture, we are not able to understand whether we are living in Andhra Pradesh or Bihar.
Actually, we are natives of Guntur, and when I was working at Excel Jr. College Guntur, Brilliant College of Surya pet approached me so that I came to Surya pet for Rs. 1.10 lacks, year contract for which he bounced to pay full amount after the fulfillment of 0.60 lacks. At that time, I completed 80% of the syllabus. So that we approached for police help and had secured justice there.
That's why next year I did not liked to do service in this college and started tuitions in home. But Triveni Jr. college people approached me for service and I convinced so that joined in service as parallel with tuitions. But the same case raised here also. They bounced 32,500/-Rs. Though I completed the 80% of syllabus. But this time I did not gone for police help. From that day my troubles are started.
Their courage is that we cannot give any evidence except the logical proof. Hence, we request your good self to enquire the truth in this issue and help us.
Thanking You…
Yours sincerely,
Y. Adi Lakshmi,
Lenin B. Yadla.
Note: S.P. had written on my complaint as "Petitioner is being harassed by the The Triveni College Authorities. She is not even allowed to take a house on rent. Take n/a report." And given to me, after ringing to C.I. of town he asked me to meet C.I. Suryapet.
******END******
SURYA PET COMPLAINT - 2
09-10-2000,
06:10:10 Hrs.
Surya pet,
Mon day.
To
The Hon`ble Chief Minister,
Sri Chandra Babu Naidu Garu,
Hyderabad.
Respected Sir,
Ref:
Our complaint dated 28-05-2000 against the disputes in Inter Public March 2000 Exams such as leak and EAMCET 2000 such as purchasing of ranks at Surya pet, Nalgonda District.
Sub:
Request to protect us from the social and financial harassment of M/s.TriveniJr.College, Mr.T.L.NarasimhaRao and Kollu Madhusudhana Rao and some of Govt. Teachers ---reg.
********** **********
With the reference cited above we Mrs. Y. Adi Lakshmi , Mr. Lenin B. Yadla private tuition lecturers bring the following to your kind notice with a request to make justice to us.
We lodged complaint about the disputes in IPE & EAMCET 2000 Exams on behalf of our student Rama Devi and her father Dr. K. Anjeneyulu as cited above. We can understand the Government policy and hence we are waiting for the justice with patience. We observed that September 2000 IPE papers we not leaked and we are thankful to your good self about it. But mean time we are facing harassment from local people who are supporting these disputes.
Here at Surya pet, the private & Govt. educational field is under the control of Govt. teachers union, Mr. T.L. Narasimha Rao and Kollu Madhusudana Rao who were retired Govt. teachers. The former is ``Best awarded Teacher of A.P. `` and the later is ``Best awarded Teacher in India ``. But along with Govt. Teachers Union, they are the God fathers of all disputes in educational field such as IPE & 10th Exam paper leaks, Mass Copying, Impersonations and scholarship goals. With their ``Ashirwadham``(blessings) only anybody or any educational institute can lead at Surya pet. We can give examples as Triveni Jr. college, Little flower school, J.R.R. Grammar school & Anjali school etc for your ready reference. Most of the children of Govt. teachers are gathered there only. In the management of almost of all schools, at least one member is a Govt. teacher.
With this back ground, they are harassing us financially and socially since we lodged complaint against their disputes by using their local pressures (either by force or fear) they are dropping our IIT basics and EAMCET students. Recently our spoken English students batch (around 15 students among them 10 belong to state Govt. Employees) had stopped to come to the classes at the end of the course (just 10 days before the farewell party for which they planned to celebrate ) and started bad propaganda on us. But we fulfilled our coaching so that they are able to speak in English with fluency within 3 months. Hence our 2nd batch was dropped utterly though two members have already joined in the course but not attending now. Such that, they are harassing us financially.
On the other hand our house owner Mr. Ratnam harassing us to vacate the house suddenly and in-facilitating us by removing fixations, water taps etc, though we are paying rent promptly as 2000/-Rs. towards rent per month and 100/-Rs. as water charges per month. Actually at the time of accommodation in the house we requested at least one year stay for which they accepted. But now, within 5 months, they are demanding us to vacate. But no house owner is willing full to give the house to us, and when one or two are ready to give but they are offering very high price such as 2600/-Rs. for single bedroom portion. Recently Mr. Chinta kuntla Narayana Reddy, working in Municipality had given such offer to us. We don`t know that much of rents here at Surya pet. 6 months back also such houses are at 1600/-Rs range. such that by using their local pressures, they are seizing our income and driving us to high expenditure with crucked plans.
On the other hand, regularly they are sending fake enquires to us and by knowing our motives, they are troubling us in all possible ways. Ex students of Brilliant Jr. college will come for enquiry but nobody will come to the classes as per their commitment to come.
Like this, we are affecting the undeclared social boycott. As per the spread in Town, unless we have the ``Ashirwadham``(blessings) from T.L.Narasimha Rao & Kollu Madhusudhana Rao , cannot lead life here. Their assets and income also supporting this talk. There is a rumor that Mr. Kollu Madhusudana Rao has a petrol bunk at Guntur District. Here also they have multi storey building and all.
Such that they are able to trouble the weak & non-local like us. In this juncture we are not able to understand whether we are living in Andhra Pradesh or Bihar. Sir, can`t we have right to live anywhere in Andhra Pradesh?
We can give one more example of their local grip on town, at surya pet. For more than one year SITY CABLE and IN CABLE had given cable service to public for Rs. 35/- per month due to their mutual competition. At the ending of 1999 both of them compromised and at a time they increased the cable charges from 35/-Rs to 90/-Rs. Then public refused to pay such high charge and formed cable consumers forum by local youth Dr. Sarat Kumar, others and claimed that the charge should not be more than 50/-Rs. By nullifying them and claiming that Doctor was living at Surya pet where as his Govt. service is at somewhere , in SITY CABLE local news (such that by showing his mistakes in his service, they black mailed him ) Mr. T.L.Narasimha Rao as claimed that his forum is the original consumers forum and declared cable charges as 75/-Rs. per month. There is a talk, that the SITY CABLE owner Mr. Uppala Rajendra Prasad had given large amount of money to Mr. T.L.Narasimha Rao for this favor.
That much is their grip on town. On the screen Mr. T.L.Narasimha Rao & Kollu Madhusudhana Rao, have some misunderstandings. But behind the screen, they are syndicate. The same case with schools and colleges here.
Sir, with such local grip, the local schools, colleges and Govt. teachers syndicate under the leadership of Mr. T.L.Narasimha Rao and Kollu Madhusudhana Rao harassing us and their courage is we can`t complaint on them since we have no proofs except the logical proof.
In this juncture, we request your good self to enquire the truth in this issue and save us from their harassment and make justice to us immediately.
Thanking you…
Yours sincerely,
Y. Adi Lakshmi,
Lenin B. Yadla, 09-10-2000
Our Address:
Smt. Adi Lakshmi EAMCET COACHING HOME,
H/O. Ratnam, behind the lane to Vijetha Hotel,
Beside Govt. primary school,
Surya pet, Nalgonda District.
*****END*****
Friday, March 13, 2009
Sri Sailam complaint –15
10:15:45 Hrs,
Thursday,
Sri Sailam
To,
Sri Y.S.R. Garu,
Hon`ble C.M. of A.P,
Hyderabad.
Respected sir,
Sub:
Complaint against continuous organized harassment on us – reg
Ref:
1]. Our complaint against EAMCET Ranks disputes, dt. 27-05-2000 To C.M. peshy.
2]. Our complaint against organized harassment on us as a result of EAMCET complaint.
3]. Our personal meet with Hon`ble C.M. on 22-04-`04 at lake view Guest house with a complaint against the continuous organized harassment including 7th common exam. result disputes over our student’s career.
***************
We, Mrs. Y. Adi Lakshmi, Lenin Babu currently residents of Srisailam brought the educational disputes of EAMCET, Inter mediate and we complained to you being C.M. of A.P. regarding the organized harassment on us as a result.
In this context, after 2 years 5 months, first time we received response letter from you through local police C.I. and we submitted our detailed complaint, statement with thanks to him as a reply to your correspondence. In this sequence, we brought our water and current problems, which we are experiencing bitterly to your kind notice on 28-02-2006. Surpringly, instead of solving the problems, with in this one and half month, those problems were increased into severe form. More over, there are threatens started such that the Devasthanam will go to cancel the room allotment. Problem of drinking water turns into severe. If we watch the water supply of others in this village, no water problem to all of the people. The O.H. Tanks of our surrounding cottages are over flowing every day. Even in our choultry, ground floor people could water their gardens with plenty. But we can’t wet our throats with water. We complained to E.O. in written but in vain. We met A.E., E.E. and complained but in vain. E.E. had warned the ground floor people who are contract labor as if they harass the first floor people with water problem, they may loss their contract jobs, but they didn’t drop back and more over they are using vulgar tongue along with the continuation of water non-allowance. How the E.O. and E.E. are not able to control a gardener, an attender and a security guard?
With this situation, there is similarity with the situation at Suryapet in 2001, when we lodged complaint on EAMCET and the following organized harassment context, as the S.P. of District, D.S.P. of the town, C.I. of Police, Local TDP Leaders, Congress leaders and particularly capable politician Mr. Meela Satya Narayana who was a king maker and able to make victory to a rebel M.L.A., and such leading personalities could not control a chicken shop owner i.e. my house owner who had a history or record of servant maid carrier in the same town in past.
No body can imagine or think that this much of harassment on them due to complaint on EAMCET afterall. Why and expecting what from us Mr. Nara Chandra Babu Naidu had harassed us, he might know. Why and expecting what from us you are continuing that harassment, you should know.
Otherwise, by watching all of this, God must know that. But I have nothing as ‘Secret of Gandi fort’ to make you to know by harassing us and searching in us. I told you my self, to your good self on 21-03-2001, when I met you at your residence that I had complained against Mr. Ramoji Rao, Enadu regarding the assassination of Mr. Rajiv Gandhi to the then Prime Minister of India, Sri P.V. Narasimha Rao and you might think that it was my immaturity or hot blood or Patriotism, but since that my life had became miserable. At that time you told that you could give recommendation letter to Mr. Meela Satyanarayana, because you were in opposition, you could not do any thing else. I don’t know whether you remember it or not but I have no secrets that you have to know by harassing me.
Then why you are harassing us and what you expect from me – This is my straight question to you.
Thanking you.
Y. Adi Lakshmi,
13-04-`06.
Lenin B. Yadla
Address:
Y.Adi Lakshmi,
Room No: 10,
Challa Venkaiah Satram,
Sri Sailam, Kurnool[dist]
***********END**************